Metacognitive control in single- vs. dual-process theory

Recent work in cognitive modelling has found that most of the data been cited as evidence for dual-process theory (DPT) reasoning is best explained by non-linear, “monotonic” one-process models. In this paper, I consider an important caveat research: it uses models are committed to unrealistic assumptions about how effectively task conditions can isolate Type-1 and Type-2 reasoning. To avoid caveat, develop a coordinated theoretical, experimental, strategy better test DPT. First, propose defined precedes follows metacognitive control, respectively. Second, argue control be isolated using debiasing paradigms manipulate heuristics (e.g., processing fluency) prevent or trigger Third, monotonic allow us decisively DPT only when we use them analyse from particular kind paradigm.